NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 164, 248, 248(5), 252(3), 455 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND RULE 87(A) OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL (AMENDMENT) RULES, 2017

 

NAME		MOBILE NO.	E-MAIL I’D
RANJEET KUMAR		8383098478, 9667769795	rk@courtkutchehry.com
JAI THAKUR		8130703334, 9355723300	jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com
RAJEEV RANJAN		9334553249	rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com
ASHOK MISHRA		9718327746	sales@courtkutchehry.com
RAVI KUMAR			ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com

Munusamy, Shareholder Of Sudha Security Protection Force Private Limited Vs. Registrar Of Companies, (2020) 07 NCLT CK 0024

NCLT allowed the application filed by the applicant, under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 for restoration of the name of the struck off company. While allowing the application NCLT held that taking into consideration the provisions of Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 under which this Application has been filed, we deem it fit to restore the name of the Company on the file of the RoC/Respondent concerned as maintained, on the grounds that the Company has been able to demonstrate that it has been carrying on business/operations for a period of two years prior to strike off.